20 самых цитируемых и 20 самых свежих научных статей про команды

Тип работы:
Реферат
Предмет:
Психология


Узнать стоимость

Детальная информация о работе

Выдержка из работы

ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. 2012. Т. 2. № 3. С. 98−100
www. orgpsyjournal. hse. ru
20 самых цитируемых и 20 самых свежих научных
ЛИТЕРАТУРНЫЙ ГИД
20 самых цитируемых и 20 самых свежих научных статей про команды
Информация приводится по данным реферативной базы Web of Science компании Thomson Reuters. Поиск производился по запросу «work team*» в названиях, аннотациях, ключевых словах статей. Учитывались только статьи из журналов, а также публикации только на английском языке. В столбце «Количество цитирований» указано абсолютное число цитирований данной статьи в Web of Science за все время ее существования. Данные о количестве цитирований собраны 24. 09. 2012.
20 самых цитируемых статей про команды
Название и выходные данные Количество
цитирований
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. 824
Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350−383. doi: 10. 2307/2 666 999
Barker, J.R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. 544
Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408−437. doi: 10. 2307/2 393 374
Gersick, C.J.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group 534
development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9−41. doi: 10. 2307/256 496
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain 520
at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234−246. doi: 10. 1037/0021−9010. 83.2. 234
Jarvenpaa, S.L., & amp- Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. 496 Organization Science, 10, 791−815. doi: 10. 1287/orsc. 10.6. 791
Sundstrom, E., Demeuse, K.P., & amp- Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and 431
effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120−133. doi: 10. 1037//0003−066x. 45.2. 120
Jehn, K.A. (1997). Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational 374
groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530−557. doi: 10. 2307/2 393 737
Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., & amp- Mount, M.K. (1998). Relating member 312
ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377−391. doi: 10. 1037/0021−9010. 83.3. 377
Kirkman, B.L., & amp- Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and 303
consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58−74. doi:
10. 2307/256 874
Manz, C.C., & amp- Sims, H.P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external 270
leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106−128. doi: 10. 2307/2 392 745
Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., Gavin, J.H., & amp- Florey, A.T. (2002). Time, teams, and task 247
performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning.
Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029−1045. doi: 10. 2307/3 069 328
98
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. 2012. Т. 2. № 3
www. orgpsyjournal. hse. ru
Campion, M.A., Papper, E.M., & amp- Medsker, G.J. (1996). Relations between work team 208
characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49,
429−452. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1744−6570. 1996. tb01806. x
Stewart, G.L., & amp- Barrick, M.R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the 189
mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135−148. doi: 10. 2307/1 556 372
Cohen, S.G., Ledford, G.E., & amp- Spreitzer, G.M. (1996). A predictive model of 176
self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643−676. doi: 10. 1177/1 872 679 604 900 506
Edmondson, A.C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote 175 learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419−1452. doi: 10. 1111/1467−6486. 386
Kelly, J.R., & amp- Barsade, S.G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. 168
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99−130. doi: 10. 1006/ obhd. 2001. 2974
Bell, B.S., & amp- Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications 160
for effective leadership. Group & amp- Organization Management, 27, 14−49. doi: 10. 1177/1 059 601 102 027 000 960
Stevens, M.J., & amp- Campion, M.A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for 157 teamwork: Implications for human-resource management. Journal of Management, 20,
503−530. doi: 10. 1177/14 920 639 402 000 210
Chatman, J.A., & amp- Flynn, FJ. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on 154
the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956−974. doi: 10. 2307/3 069 440
Sy, T., Cote, S., & amp- Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader'-s mood 153
on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 90, 295−305. doi: 10. 1037/0021−9010. 90.2. 295_____________________________
20 наиболее свежих статей про команды
Название и выходные данные Количество цитирований
Schulte, M., Cohen, N.A., & amp- Klein, K.J. (2012). The Coevolution of Network Ties and Perceptions of Team Psychological Safety. Organization Science, 23, 564−581. doi: 10. 1287/orsc. 1100. 0582 2
Guimaraes, L.B.D., Anzanello, M.J., & amp- Renner, J.S. (2012). A learning curve-based method to implement multifunctional work teams in the Brazilian footwear sector. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 541−547. doi: 10. 1016/j. apergo. 2011. 08. 008 1
Nielsen, T.M., Bachrach, D.G., Sundstrom, E., & amp- Halfhill, T.R. (2012). Utility of OCB: Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Group Performance in a Resource Allocation Framework. Journal of Management, 38, 668−694. doi: 10. 1177/149 206 309 356 326 1
Savelsbergh, C., Gevers, J.M.P., van der Heijden, B., & amp- Poell, R.F. (2012). Team Role Stress: Relationships With Team Learning and Performance in Project Teams. Group & amp- Organization Management, 37, 67−100. doi: 10. 1177/1 059 601 111 431 977 1
Swann, W.B., Jetten, J., Gomez, A., Whitehouse, H., & amp- Bastian, B. (2012). When Group Membership Gets Personal: A Theory of Identity Fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441−456. doi: 10. 1037/a0028589 1
Carton, A.M., & amp- Cummings, J.N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review, 37, 441−470. doi: 10. 5465/amr. 2009. 0322 0
99
ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ. 2012. Т. 2. № 3
www. orgpsyjournal. hse. ru
Chang, J.W., Sy, T., & amp- Choi, J.N. (2012). Team Emotional Intelligence and Performance: 0
Interactive Dynamics between Leaders and Members. Small Group Research, 43, 75−104. doi: 10. 1177/1 046 496 411 415 692
Chen, Z.J., Qin, X., & amp- Vogel, D. (2012). Is Cooperation a Panacea? The Effect of 0
Cooperative Response to Task Conflict on Team Performance. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, 163−178. doi: 10. 1002/sres. 2104
Ely, R.J., Padavic, I., & amp- Thomas, D.A. (2012). Racial Diversity, Racial Asymmetries, and 0
Team Learning Environment: Effects on Performance. Organization Studies, 33, 341−362. doi: 10. 1177/170 840 611 435 597
Heidemeier, H., & amp- Bittner, J.V. (2012). Competition and Achievement Goals in Work 0
Teams. Human Performance, 25, 138−158. doi: 10. 1080/8 959 285. 2012. 658 929
Huang, M.P., Liang, W.C., & amp- Hsin, C.N. (2012). Confucian dynamism work values and 0
team performance: A multiple-level analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15,
178−188. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467−839X. 2012. 1 369. x
Ishak, A.W., & amp- Ballard, D.I. (2012). Time to Re-Group: A Typology and 0
Nested Phase Model for Action Teams. Small Group Research, 43, 3−29. doi: 10. 1177/1 046 496 411 425 250
Kouchaki, M., Okhuysen, G.A., Waller, M.J., & amp- Tajeddin, G. (2012). The Treatment 0
of the Relationship Between Groups and Their Environments: A Review and Critical Examination of Common Assumptions in Research. Group & amp- Organization Management,
37, 171−203. doi: 10. 1177/1 059 601 112 443 850
O'-Neill, T.A., & amp- Allen, N.J. (2012). Team Meeting Attitudes: Conceptualization 0
and Investigation of a New Construct. Small Group Research, 43, 186−210. doi: 10. 1177/1 046 496 411 426 485
Sivasubramaniam, N., Liebowitz, S.J., & amp- Lackman, C.L. (2012). Determinants of New 0
Product Development Team Performance: A Meta-analytic Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 803−820. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1540−5885. 2012. 940. x
Staats, B.R., Milkman, K.L., & amp- Fox, C.R. (2012). The team scaling fallacy: 0
Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 132−142. doi: 10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2012. 03. 002
Tsai, W.C., Chi, N.W., Grandey, A.A., & amp- Fung, S.C. (2012). Positive group affective tone 0
and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 638−656. doi: 10. 1002/job. 775
Wageman, R., Gardner, H., & amp- Mortensen, M. (2012). The changing ecology of teams: 0
New directions for teams research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 301−315. doi: 10. 1002/job. 1775
Wildman, J.L., Shuffler, M.L., Lazzara, E.H., Fiore, S.M., Burke, C.S., Salas, E., 0
& amp- Garven, S. (2012). Trust Development in Swift Starting Action Teams: A Multilevel Framework. Group & amp- Organization Management, 37, 137−170. doi: 10. 1177/1 059 601 111 434 202
Zhang, Z., Waldman, D.A., & amp- Wang, Z. (2012). A multilevel investigation of leader- 0
member exchange, informal leader emergence, and individual and team performance.
Personnel Psychology, 65, 49−78. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1744−6570. 2011. 1 238. x
100

ПоказатьСвернуть
Заполнить форму текущей работой