Dielectric relaxation of fulleroid materials filled pa6 composites and the study of its mechanical performance

Тип работы:


Детальная информация о работе

Выдержка из работы

Dielectric relaxation of fulleroid materials filled PA6 composites and the study of its mechanical performance
Alex N. Sinitsin1, Vjacheslav V. Zuev1'-2
: ITMO University, Kronverkskiy pr., 49, 197 101 St. Petersburg, Russia 2Institute of Macromolecular Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoi pr. 31, 199 004 St. Petersburg, Russia lyubomirov85@mail. ru, zuev@hq. macro. ru
PACS 81. 07. Lb DOI 10. 17 586/2220−8054−2015−6-4−570−582
The effect of fulleroid materials (fullerene C6o and fullerene soot which is used for fullerenes production) on the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites based on polyamide 6 (PA6) was investigated. Composites were synthesized by direct mixing in an extruder. Dielectric spectroscopy was used to investigate the influence of nanoparticles on relaxation processes in the polymer matrix. It is found that the segmental relaxation processes becomes faster with the addition of fullerene C60. In contrast, the secondary processes of PA6/fullerene C60 nanocomposites were observed to slow down with the addition of fullerene C6o. This means that the local '-molecular stiffness'- is increased, and a phenomenological link between the secondary relaxation times and the mechanical properties explains the increase in the Young'-s modulus of the nanocomposites upon the addition of C60. These observations suggest that nanoparticles can have a qualitatively different effect on the matrix polymer dynamics at different length scales, and caution must be taken in comparing the changes in the dynamics associated with different relaxation processes.
Keywords: composites- manufacturing- mechanical properties- fullerene C60- fullerene soot: dielectric spec-troscopy.
Received: 2 March 2015 Revised: 18 April 2015
1. Introduction
Reinforcing thermoplastic polymers with nanoparticles to form nanocomposites is one means to increase the usage of polymeric materials. A number of polymers can be considered as competitive materials for tribological applications because of their low friction coefficients against steel counterparts, good damping properties, and self-lubricating ability. Among thermoplastic polymers, PA6 has become a strong competitor matrix owing to its good thermal stability, low dielectric constant and high tensile strength. PA6 has been reported to have a superior wear resistance sliding against a steel counterface relative to other polymers. In order to meet the special needs of tribological applications, polymer composites can be designed by selecting the correct composition and choosing an appropriate manufacturing process. The improvement of mechanical and/or tribological properties of polymers by incorporation of particulate filler materials has been widely studied [1]. Under extreme friction conditions, however, conventional polymer composites usually are not effective for antiwear and friction reduction- for example, under heavy load. Nanoparticle-reinforced polymer composites are the most rapidly growing class of materials due to a good combination of high strength and modulus at very low level of loading [2]. Nanocomposites are compatible with conventional polymer processing, thus avoiding the costly lay up required for the fabrication of conventional fiber-reinforced composites. When the fillers'- sizes are on the order of nanometers, even small a concentration can
lead to enhancements in properties unprecedented in conventional composites [3]. The unique properties of polymer nanocomposites are attributed to the high filler surface area-to-volume ratio, which results in significant interfacial contact areas between the polymer and the particles. The large interfacial contact areas enable a substantial fraction of polymer segments to interact directly with the filler particles, even at low particle concentrations.
Polymer/ fullerene C6o blends are an ideal system to study polymer-nanoparticles interactions since fullerene C60 is monodisperse, available in high purity, and dispersible in many polymer and block copolymers [4]. The most challenging problem in the fabrication of polymer nanocomposites is dispersing the nanofillers in the polymer matrix [5]. Nanofillers strongly self-associate into ropes and other high-ordered structures which are extremely difficult to disperse in polymers. As result, the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites can be very far from that which was predicted [6]. Here, we use broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS) to directly measure the influence of fullerene C60 on the polymer relaxations corresponding to different lengths and time scales. BDS is one of the most efficient tools for studying the molecular relaxations of polymers. It covers a broad frequency range, allowing measurement of different relaxation processes simultaneously, and even entire chain relaxation processes under favorable circumstances [7].
We studied the influence of fullerene C60 or fullerene C60 containing materials on the mechanical properties of PA6 based composites. In this paper, we report the data obtained from BDS measurements.
2. Experimental
2.1. Material and manufacturing
Fullerene C60 (purity 99. 9%), and fullerene soot, containing about 10. 5% fullerenes, which was supplied by ZAO ILIP (Russia), were used as fillers. The fullerene soot used is an ultra dispersed carbon formed by a voltaic arc of graphite in an inert gas atmosphere during fullerene production, with particle diameters of 0.5 -2.0m. Plasticizer ARMOSIL E® (AKZO NOBEL, (amide of oleic acid)) was added to the 1% C60 samples to aid the C60 dispersion.
The granules of PA6 (Volgamid® 32, OAO Kuibishevasot, Russia, here after B32, density 1. 14 g/cm3) were used for the preparation of nanocomposites. We used a C60 solution in o-xylene as the means for impregnating the granules with a calculated amount of fullerene. The fullerene soot was premixed with calculated amounts of PA6 granules for 5 min in a high-speed powder mixer. After that, the granules were dried for 5 h at 80 °C. The composite preparation was carried out in a single screw extruder (Haake Rheocord, Germany) at a screw speed of 50 rpm. Plasticizer ARMOSIL E® (AKZO NOBEL, (amide of oleic acid)) was added to the PA6 granules with 1% C60 to aid the best C60 dispersion. The temperature setting from the hopper to the die was 220/225/230/235 °C. During melt extrusion, ventilation was kept on to remove trapped air in materials. After pelletizing, the nanocomposite granules were dried for 5 h at 80 °C. Dried pellets were injected-molded (KM-160E injecting molding machine, KraussMaffei, Germany) into standard test species. The temperature profile setting from hopper to nozzle ranged from 200 — 215 °C and the mold temperature was kept at 25 °C. The holding pressure and screw rotation speed were 300 bar and 100 rpm respectively with throughput of 50 cm3/s. As a reference, neat PA6 was also similarly extruded and injected-molded. For dielectric measurements, nanocomposite pellets were placed and melted in a parallel-plate capacitor with 20 mm diameter- a pair of glass fiber with 80m diameter was used as the spacer between electrodes.
2.2. Mechanical properties
Tensile properties were measured in the accordance with ISO 527. Tests were conducted using 6x6x40 mm3 specimens for tensile strength and Young'-s modulus estimation on a UTS 10 devise (UTS Test System, Germany) at an elongation rate of 2 mm/min. No less than 5 specimens were taken for each sample to obtain an average value. Shore D hardness test of composites were performed according to the ASTM 2240 using a Zwick/Roell Test stand 7206. 200 machine. To increases the accuracy of measurement, all samples'- surfaces were well polished using high-grade sandpaper prior to test. An average hardness was calculated by 10 indentation measurements.
2.3. Microscopy
An optical microscope, Micromed Met 400 (Micromed Met, Russia), with magnification up to 400 x, was used to analyze the worn surfaces of the composites. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained with Zeiss ULTRAplus FEG-SEM instrument with magnification 2. 000 — 30. 000 x.
2.4. Thermal properties
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed using a Netzsch DSC 204F1 instrument at a scan rate 10 K/min. The thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) measurements were performed in an inert N2 atmosphere and an oxygenated atmosphere on a NTZSCH TG 209 F1 instrument with Al2O3 pan using 2−3 mg of nanocomposite as probe. The samples were heated 30 — 800 °C and the temperature was raised at the rate of 10 K/min.
2.5. Dielectric spectroscopy
Measurements were performed with an Alpha Analyzer combined with a Quatro Temperature Control system unit that provides temperature stability of 0.1 °C, both by Novocontrol. Complex dielectric permittivity e*(f) = e'-(f) — ie& quot-(f) was measured isothermally in steps of 5 °C over the temperature interval -150 to +200 °C and frequency range from 10−2 to 106 Hz. Nanocomposite films were placed and melt in parallel-plate copper capacitor with 20 mm diameter, and a pair of glass fiber with 50m diameter was used as the spacers between electrodes.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation of nanocomposites
The reinforcement effect in nanocomposites is very sensitive to the quality of the nanoparticle dispersion [5]. Fabrication methods are overwhelmingly focused on improving nanofiller dispersion because better filler distribution in the polymer matrices has been found to improve the nanocomposites'- properties. In-situ polymerization is generally more effective than other potential methods in dispersing nanofillers in a polymer matrix due to the high viscosities of polymeric solutions and melts. Furthermore, in-situ polymerization methods enable covalent bonding between the nanofillers and the polymer matrix by using various reactions to promote compatibilization as was shown by us previously [8]. Conversely, mixing in an extruder is a more acceptable industrial method for the preparation of polymer composites. This stimulated us to use this method as a fabrication technique for the synthesis of PA6/fulleroid material nanocomposites.
As an initial level of analysis, the dispersion state of fullerene C60 can be evaluated by the polymer nanocomposite'-s color. It is well known, that if fullerene C60 is semicrystalline
or aggregated in a polymer matrix, the nanocomposite has a brownish color, while when it is well dispersed in polystyrene the color is purple, or orange when in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) [9]. We used a fUllerene C60 solution in o-xylene as the means of impregnating the granules with a calculated amount of the fullerene C60 because this pathway gives much better results than pulverization [10]. As a result, the samples containing 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60 after injecting molding were light cream colored. In the SEM images of these samples, one can not find any aggregates of fullerene C60. However, it is well known that the results of the scattering methods regarding dispersion of nanofillers in polymers are difficult to interpret because of the low contrast, and because the precise rigid-rod behavior (I к Q-1) is not equivalent to good dispersion at all length scales [11]. Hence, the light cream color of the nanocomposites may give evidence that the fullerene C60 dispersion is not on the molecular level.
A similar way of preparing nanocomposites with 1 wt.% of fullerene C60 leads to aggregation of nanofillers in the polymer matrix, as seen from the SEM images. To solve this problem, we have added a plasticizer (ARMOSIL E, at 0. 05 wt. %) to the composition. The decrease in viscosity of the polymer melt allows for better dispersion of the filler and the resulting nanocomposite after injection molding was light cream colored (similar to the composite with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60). The SEM images of these samples also did not show any aggregates of fullerene C60 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. SEM micrographs (x30 k) of polymer nanocomposites: (a) with 1 wt.% of fullerene Ceo and 0. 05 wt.% of ARMOSIL E- (b) with 1 wt.% of fullerene soot
The similarity of the quality of fullerene C60 dispersion in both composites (with 0. 01 and 1 wt.% of fullerene C60) is supported by DSC measurements. The melting temperatures of neat PA6 and the composites are nearly identical (Table 1).
To estimate the crystallinity of the samples, a value of 190.6 J/g was used for the melting enthalpy of 100% crystalline PA6 [12]. The degree of crystallinity, x, was calculated from the areas of the corresponding DSC melting peaks according to x = Hm/AHi00, where x is degree of crystallinity, AHm is the peak area of the consideration, and AHi00 is the heat of fusion of 100% crystalline PA6. We have found that the crystallinity of nanocomposites is increased in comparison with neat PA6 (from 22% to 26 — 27%), independently of the fullerene C60 content (for nanocomposite with 1 wt.% of fullerene C60 this amount should be subtracted from the total mass of the composite), allowing us to neglect any differences in the fullerene C60 dispersion quality in both nanocomposites. A micrograph of the PA6 nanocomposite surface filled with fullerene soot (Fig. 1) demonstrates that no segregation of soot particles is observed and that
A. N. Sinitsin, V. V. Zuev Table 1. Molten behavior of neat PA6 and nanocomposites
Loading, wt.% Tm (°C) AH, J/g Crystallinity, %
B32 221 42.3 22
Fullerene C60
0. 01 221 51.0 27
1& quot- 220 48.1 25
Fullerene Soot
1 221 45.4 24
°0. 05 wt.% of ARMOSIL E (AKZO NOBEL)
they are randomly distributed in the polymer matrix. This is favorable for achieving greater matrix stiffness and consequently increases the toughening efficiency.
Thus, we see that our method for preparing the PA6/fulleroid materials is free from filler aggregation, thus allowing us to investigate the influence of pristine fulleroid filler (with no ropes and other high-ordered structures) on the properties of nanocomposites.
3.2. Mechanical properties
The main improvement in mechanical properties of nanocomposites relates to the large increase in modulus. Usually, an increase in the modulus of approximately 10% per wt.% filler has been observed in both in situ polymerized and melt processed PA6 nanocomposites [13]. Such an increase is too small for nanofillers which are used with much lower loadings. In our previous work, both the tensile modulus and tensile strength of in situ-polymerized PA6 composites were improved by up to 15% with a loading of 0. 01 wt.% fullerene C6o. The tensile mechanical properties of composites under study are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Effect of loading on the mechanical properties of the polymer nanocomposites
Loading, wt.% Young'-s modulus (E), GPa Tensile strength a, MPa Elongation e, % Hardness Shore D (H) Rigidity (E/H) x10−3 Resistance to plastic deformation (H 3/E2)x105
B32 0. 693 ± 0. 017 63 ± 1 290 ± 6 72. 18 9. 60 7. 83
Fullerene C60
0. 01 0. 714 ± 0. 022 65 ± 1 301 ± 6 73. 35 9. 73 7. 74
1& quot- 0. 265 ± 0. 037 11 ± 1 287 ± 2 48. 93 5. 42 1. 65
Fullerene Soot
1 0. 622 ± 0. 045 62 ± 1 286 ± 14 73. 06 8. 51 10. 15
° 0. 05 wt.% of ARMOSIL E (AKZO NOBEL)
Table 2 shows that the Young'-s modulus, the tensile strength and elongation of the melt processed nanocomposite increase slightly at this filler loading. Furthermore, all of these parameters decrease significantly with an increase in the filler concentration. This is mainly attributed to the carbon particles aggregating easily as the filler concentration is increased. Additionally, the sample with 1% of fullerene C60 also contained ARMOSLIP E (0. 05%) which acted as a plasticizer. The difference in the properties of neat PA6 synthesized by us [8] and commercial 32 used as the choice of polymer for extrusion can be related to effect of reprocessing [14].
The possibility of degradation is of clear importance here, since two mixing cycles are needed to produce these materials. For nanocomposites, besides the possible degradation processes associated with the matrix, additional degradation processes due to the presence of nanoparticles can occur. These processes can lead to additional degradation of the matrix induced by the presence of nanoparticles, as the latter can act as a catalyst- degradation by modification of the polymer/filler interface or degradation by collapsing and agglomeration of the nanoparticles. If any of the above processes take place to a significant extent, they would influence the mechanical properties. In our case the first two possibilities are excluded because the fullerene C6o prevents all free-radical degradation processes of polymers, including mechanodestruction. This was supported by the data of TGA measurements (Fig. 2). As one can see, the TGA curves for neat B32 and all nanocomposites are identical.
Fig. 2. TGA curve of neat PA6 (1) — and with 1 wt.% of fullerene soot (2)
As can be seen from Table 2, the hardness of nanocomposites (without adding the plasticizer) increased slightly in comparison to neat PA6, which can be connected with increased crystallinity. According to conventional fracture mechanics theory, the ratio of the Young'-s modulus and hardness (E/H ratio) represents the rigidity of a material and the ratio H3/E2 represents the resistance to plastic deformation. Hence, the nanocomposite with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60 added was found to be highly rigid and tough. Such spectacular increase of the overall stiffness is generally reported upon the addition of very low fractions of nanofillers (e.g., clay or phyllosilicates [15]). This remarkable improvement in mechanical properties in regard to the neat PA6, compared to conventional polymer composites with similar filler content, is attributed to the high specific area of the nanoparticles, and therefore, to the strong interactions with polymer macromolecules [16]. PA6 is a crystalline thermoplastic polymer and its crystalline structure can involve different forms which coexist in different amounts depending on the processing conditions and additives. PA6 usually crystallizes into two forms: a and y [17]. Although the a and 7-forms are thermally stable, the addition of nanopatricles can induce a crystal transformation from the a-form to the Y-form and inversely, that has
been well documented using DSC, FTIR, XRD, and NMR measurements [18]. The PA6 aphase crystals were reported to exhibit a higher modulus than those of the 7-phase [19]. This could be one of the reasons for the enhanced properties observed in PA6 composites reinforced with various materials. The fullerene C60 [8] or fullerene C60-like inorganic fillers [13] have an a-nucleation effect on the PA6-matrix upon in situ polymerization. It was manifested as ground for reinforcing mechanism of such types of nanocomposites [20]. The thermal properties of the composites were investigated by DSC. However, fullerene C60 does not change the crystallization behavior of PA6 nanocomposites prepared by the extrusion method. Only the a-form crystalline phase was found in B32 and the nanocomposites prepared by us. Therefore, there should be other reinforcing mechanisms. Essentially these mechanisms should involve active interactions between the fullerene C60 and PA6 chains.
Here, we use BDS to measure directly the influence of fullerene C60 on the polymer relaxations corresponding to different lengths and time scales.
3.3. Dielectric spectroscopy
Complex dielectric permittivity e* was measured over wide frequency and temperature ranges. Fig. 3 is an isochronal graph of the dielectric loss of the B32 and nanocomposites as a function of temperature.
Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity for neat PA6 (1) — with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60 (2) — with 1 wt.% of fullerene soot (3) at 1 Hz
Three relaxations can be identified in all samples. They were identified and reported for the pure PA6 [21−24]. In the present work, the effect of water on the relaxation processes is considered to be negligible, due to the initial drying of the materials prior to testing. If any small amounts of water remained in the samples, it was firmly bound water. Additionally, similar amounts of bound water should be present in all tested samples, thereby making direct comparison of the results possible.
The main characteristic of each relaxation process is the most probable relaxation time, determined according to [25] as:
nafi a
= ten
2(? + 1)
, 2(fi + 1)//
Based on the previous experience, a model function has been fitted to the dielectric data, with the Havriliak — Negami (N-H) phenomenological relation [26]:
?* (ш) = +
(1 + (iutne)1-a)?-
being the most general form. In this expression, e* = e'- - ie& quot-, is the complex dielectric function, u = 2nf, f is the field frequency, Ae is the intensity of the dielectric process, tnh = ½nfNH and fNH is the position of the relaxation process on the frequency scale, e is e
(f) for f & gt- fNH, a and fi are shape parameters representing the symmetrical and asymmetrical broadening of the relaxation with respect to the Debye peak. Fig. 4 displays the fits obtained when one NH term is used to fit the relaxation spectrum obtained for the nanocomposite with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60 at 223 K. The quality of the fit is quite good and the characteristic relaxation time for each relaxation process (Fig. 4a shows Y-relaxation and fi-relaxation) can be extracted.
Fig. 4. Decomposition in N-H distributions of the isothermal runs of imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity for nanocomposite with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60 sample (a) and with 1 wt.% and of fullerene C60 and 0. 05 wt.% of ARMOSIL E (b): (¦) is experimental points- solid line is sum of calculated profiles
The y- and в-relaxations are due to relatively shorter chain motions. The dependences of — log Tmax on the inverse temperature are linear for all nanocomposites and neat B32 in the regions of y and в processes (Fig. 5). As a result, the temperature dependence of these relaxations can be modeled by an Arrhenius type expression (Eq. 3) [27]:
T (T)max = TO exJ. (3)
Here, т0 Table 3.
at T -y to, Ea is the activation energy. Values of t0 and Ea are given in
3.3 3. s 4.3 4. s
1000/T (К Л)
4.s 5.3 5. s 6.3 6. s 7. 3
1000/T (K)
Fig. 5. Dependences of — logTmax on repciprocal temperature for neat PA6 (1) and nanocomposites with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C6o (2) — with 1 wt.% and of fullerene C60 and 0. 05 wt.% of ARMOSIL E (3) — with 1 wt.% of fullerene soot (4) — a: a-relaxation process- b: в-relaxation process- c: 7-relaxation process
Table 3. Tg and parameters of 7, fi and a (from VFT fit) relaxation processes of neat PA6 and nanocomposites
Loading, wt.% kcal/mol To, s T-WT D kcal/mol To, K Tg, K
Y -mode 6. 43 1×10−11 2. 58
P -mode 15. 65 1×10−17
a-mode 1.9×10−7 1. 18 260 360
Fullerene 0. 01% C60
Y -mode 8. 79 1×10−13
P -mode 16. 59 1×10−18
a-mode 5.9×10−6 2. 59 1. 14 260 360
Y-mode 7. 39 1×10−13
P -mode 13. 25 1×10−15
a-mode 4.5×10−5 3. 42 1. 55 261 335
Fullerene Soot 1%
Y-mode 9. 19 1×10−14
P-mode 15. 63 1×10−17
a-mode 7.6×10−9 2. 65 5. 02 260 360
° 0. 05 wt.% of ARMOSIL E (AKZO NOBEL)
The P-relaxation is phenomenologically linked to the mechanical properties of polymeric materials [28,29]. From Table 3, one can see that symbatic changes of Ea and Young'-s modulus for the composites shows that the presence of fullerene hampers the molecular motions in the composites, leading to hardening of the polymer chains and impeding secondary relaxation processes. This explains the increase in Young'-s modulus for the nanocomposites. Assignment of molecular motions associated with the P-relaxation is complicated and a number of varying opinions exist in the literature [21−24]. However, these motions should be connected with the motion of amide groups together with neighboring methylene groups, and size of this moving unit is comparable to the size of the fullerene Ceo molecule. This can explain the hampering of P-relaxation upon introduction of such fillers.
The low temperature 7-relaxation involves the motion of short sequences of CH2 groups connected with an amide group which provides the dielectric activity. As a result, the dependence of Ea of the 7-relaxation on the amount of nanofiller is quite. The tightly bound fullerene molecules create inter-chain bonds between the neighboring carbonyl groups, thus increasing the energy necessary to reorient the dipolar entities whose motion causes the 7 process. The introduction of the plasticizer slightly blurs this dependence.
It is well known that the P process is related to the toughness of the polymer [25]. The nanocomposite with 1 wt.% of fullerene soot was found to be both rigid and tough (Table 2). There was a demonstrated decrease in the activation energy of the P process compared to that of the nanocomposite with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60. This indicated that carbon nanoparticles can significantly improve the energy dissipation process in the polyamide matrix. This process can lead to domination of the plastic deformation mechanism in the composite that effectively blunts
the crack trip. Hence, the suggested mechanism could be a major reason for the higher values of the resistance to plastic deformation. This mechanism is applicable to both semicrystalline and amorphous systems and is typically absent in conventional polymer composites. The decrease in the activation energy of the fi relaxation process indicates that the mobility of polymer matrix is a pre-condition for this mechanism to be effective. In other words, the increase in toughness is proportional to the increase in the local mobility of the polymer chains, which in turn determines the nanoparticle mobility.
The a-relaxation (the highest temperature relaxation in Fig. 3) is connected with onset of large-scale motions of chain segments in the vicinity of Tg. At higher temperatures near the a relaxation process, heating is accompanied by creation of carriers due to ionization of impurities and the breaking of chemical bonds (e.g., the N-H bonds, etc.). Hence, it is necessary to add an additional term connected with conductivity in Eq. (2):
e*(u) = e^ ±Ae-- if-1. (4)
() ~ (1 + (iUTNH uej W
In this equation, a0 is dc conductivity and e0 is the permittivity of free space (8. 854 pF/m). Fig. 4b displays the fits obtained when two such N-H terms are used to fit relaxation spectrum obtained for the nanocomposite with 0. 01 wt.% of fullerene C60 at 330 K. The fitting procedure is complicated because of the presence of very often incomplete peaks, in spite of the frequency window extending over more than 8 decades. As the temperature increases, the relaxation peaks shift to higher frequencies and sweep the frequency window with different speeds characteristic of the relaxation energy of each mode. The fit is quite good and the characteristic relaxation time for the a-relaxation process can be extracted. The temperature dependence of the characteristic relaxation times can then be described using the Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann equation [30]:
T = T0exp (TD-k) & gt- (5)
where T0 is the relaxation time at infinite high temperature, T0 is so-called Vogel temperature at which the relaxation time goes to infinity, and D is the parameter related to the fragility of material [31]. A smaller value of D implies steeper temperature dependence of the relaxation time or a more '-fragile'- behavior. The changes in the D values for the nanocomposites show that additives such as fullerene C60 enhance the fragility of glass formation related to the molecular packing efficiency of polymer materials, which is indicated physically by softening of the material in the glass state. EVTF is the characteristic energy for the Vogel-Tammann-Fulcher (VTF) relaxation times and can be found as EVTF = DT0. The relaxation diagrams — log Tmax vs. 1/T are curved for the VTF dependences (Fig. 5).
The VFT energies increase with the addition of fullerene C60, but the glass transition temperature does not change. This effect is opposite to the typical result for nanofiller addition, well documented as the '-antiplasticization'- phenomenon. In a typical antiplasticization effect, the additives will cause a decrease in the second relaxation time and an increase in the a relaxation time [32]. The addition of fullerene C60, as reported in literature, can either increase or decrease the glass transition temperature of the polymer matrix [33]. In our opinion, this effect is related to the way in which fullerene C60 is incorporated in the polymer matrix (for example, with formation of inclusion complexes in which the C60 molecules are encapsulated within the polymer chain cavity [34]), and the quality of the filler dispersion. In the case of poor dispersion, the aggregates have act as macrofillers, leading to a decrease in the glass transition temperature of the polymer matrix.
Finally, it is clear that the complex character of the nanoparticle-polymer matrix interactions and better understanding of how nanoparticles can modify the basic polymer properties are of obvious practical, as well as scientific interest. Although the immobilization is a reasonable reinforcing mechanism and its molecular origin is well documented [27−29], a precise prediction or simulation of its extent for various composite systems still represents an intriguing unresolved problem.
4. Conclusions
The following conclusions can be drawn from the present study. Fullerene C60, as a filler, improves the mechanical performance of PA6 based composite at low loading. Dielectric spectroscopy was used to investigate the influence of nanoparticles on relaxation processes in polymer matrix. The segmental relaxation processes become faster with the fullerene C6o addition. In contrast, the secondary processes in PA6/ fullerene C60 nanocomposites were observed to slow down with fullerene C60 addition. This indicates an increase in the local '-molecular stiffness'-. Therefore, the local '-molecular stiffness'- is increased, and the second relaxation times are phenomenologically linked to the mechanical properties, which may explain the increased Young'-s moduli of nanocomposites with fullerene C60 additives. These observations suggest that nanoparticles can have a qualitatively different effect on matrix polymer dynamics at different length scales, and caution must be taken when comparing changes in the dynamics associated with different relaxation processes.
[1] Bijwe J., Logani C.M., Tewari U.S. Influence of fillers and fiber reinforcement on abrasive wear resistance of some polymeric composites. Wear, 1990, 138, P. 77−92.
[2] Treacy M.M.J., Ebesen T.W., Gibson J.M. Nanoparticles as reinforced agents. Nature, 1996, 381, P. 678−680.
[3] Strobl G. The Physics of Polymers. Springer, Berlin, 2007, 450 p.
[4] Prato M. [60] Fullerene chemistry for material science applications. J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7, P. 1097−1109.
[5] Schaefer D.W., Justice R.S. How nano are nanocomposites. Macromolecules, 2007, 40, P. 8501−8517.
[6] Spitalsky Z., Tasis D., Papagelis K., Galiotis K. Carbon nanotube-polymer composites: Chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties. Prog. Polym. Sci., 2010, 35, P. 357−401.
[7] Adachi K, Kotaka T. Dielectric normal mode relaxation. Progr. Polym. Sci., 1993, 18, P. 585−622.
[8] Zuev V.V., Ivanova Y.G. Mechanical and electrical properties of polyamide-6 based nanocomposites reinforced by fulleroid fillers. Polym. Eng. Sci., 2012, 52, P. 1206−1211.
[9] Kawauchi M., Kawauchi T., Takeichi T. Solubilization of [60]Fullerene Owing to Inclusion Complex Formation between Syndiotactic Poly (methyl methacrylate) and the Fullerenes in Polar Solvents. Macromolecules, 2009, 42, P. 6136−6142.
[10] Zuev V.V., Shlikov A.V. Polyamide 12/ fullerene C6o composites: investigation on their mechanical and dielectric properties. J. Polym. Research, 2012, 19, P. 1−6 (9925).
[11] Moniruzzaman M., Winey K.I. Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules, 2006, 39, P. 5194−5205.
[12] Russo P., Acierno D., Di Maio L., Demma G. Thermal and mechanical characterization of films from nylon 6/EVOH blends. Eur. Polym. J., 1999, 35 (7), P. 1261−1268.
[13] Naffakh M., Diaz-Pascual A.M., et al. Opportunities and challenges in the use of inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles to produce advanced polymer nanocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci., 2013, 38, P. 1163−1231.
[14] Goitisolo I., Eguiazabal J.I., Nazabal J. Effects of reprocessing on the structure and properties of polyamide 6 nanocomposites. Polym. Deg. Stab., 2008, 93, P. 1747−1752.
[15] Lincoln D.M., Vaia R.A., Wang Z. -G., Hsiao B.S. Secondary structure and elevated temperature crystallite morphology of nylon-6/ layered silicate nanocomposites. Polymer, 2001, 42, P. 1621−1629.
[16] Liu H., Brinson L.C. Reinforcing efficiency of nanoparticles: a simple comparison for nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Tech., 2008, 68, P. 1502−1512.
[17] Liu T., Phang I.Y., et al. Morphology and mechanical properties of multywalled carbon nanotubes reinforced nylon-6 composites. Macromolecules, 2004, 37, P. 7214−7222.
[18] Wu T.M., Liao C.S. Polymorphism in nylon 6/clay nanocomposites. Macromo. Chem. Phys., 2000, 201, P. 2820−25.
[19] Ito M., Mituochi K., Kanamoto T. Effects of crystalline forms on the deformation behaviour of nylon-6. Polymer, 1998, 39, P. 4593−4598.
[20] Mesbah A., Zari F., et al. Experimental characterization and modeling stiffness of polymer/clay nanocomposites within a hierarchical multiscale framework. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2009, 114, P. 3274−91.
[21] Avakian P., Matheson R.R., Starkweather H.W. Implications of dielectric response for the mechanism of changes in oxygen transport due to traces of moisture in amorphous nylons. Macromolecules, 1991, 24, P. 4698−4700.
[22] Laredo E., Grimau M., Sanchez F., Bello A. Water Absorption Effect on the Dynamic Properties of Nylon-6 by Dielectric Spectroscopy. Macromolecules, 2003, 36, P. 9840−9850.
[23] Laredo E., Hernandez M.C. Moisture effect on the low- and high-temperature dielectric relaxations in nylon-6. J. Polym. Sci. B, 1997, 35, P. 2879−2888.
[24] Frank B., Frubing P., Pissis P. Water sorption and thermally stimulated depolarization currents in nylon-6. J. Polym. Sci. B, 1996, 34, P. 1853−1860.
[25] Havriliak S., Negami S. A complex plane analysis of a-dispersions in some polymer systems. J. Polym. Sci. C, 1966, 14, P. 99−117.
[26] Havriliak S., Negami S. A complex plane representation of dielectric and mechanical relaxation processes in some polymers. Polymer, 1967, 8, P. 161−210.
[27] Allegra G., Raos G., Vacatello M. Theories and simulations of polymer based nanocomposites: from chain statistics to reinforcement. Prog. Polym. Sci., 2008, 33, P. 683−731.
[28] Reynaud E., Jouen T., et al. Nanofillers in polymeric matrix: astudy on silica reinforced PA6. Polymer, 2001, 42, P. 8759−8768.
[29] P. Ramasundaram S., Kim K.J. In-situ synthesis and characterization of polyamide 6/POSS nanocomposites. Macromol. Symp., 2007, 249−250, P. 295−302.
[30] Kremer F., Schonhals A. Broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Springer, New York, 2003, 430 p.
[31] Angell C.A., Ngai K.L., et al. Relaxation in glassforming liquids and amorphous solids. J. Appl. Phys., 2000, 88, P. 3113.
[32] Pikhurov D.V., Zuev V.V. The effect of fullerene Сбо on the mechanical and dielectric behaviour of epoxy resins at low loading. Nanosystems: Phys., Chem., Math., 2013, 4 (6), P. 834−843.
[33] Wang C., Guo Z. -X. et al. Polymers containing fullerene or carbon nanotube structures. Prog. Polym. Sci., 2004, 29, P. 1079−1141.
[34] Zuev V.V. Polymer nanocomposites containing fullerene C60 nanofillers. Macromol. Symp., 2011, 301, P. 157 161.

Заполнить форму текущей работой